Thursday, March 5, 2009

Is Obamamania Fading Amonst the Media?


Written by Alan Caruba...

The day following President Obama’s State of the Union speech I opened my daily newspaper to read the headline “What the president said and what the facts say.” It was an Associated Press story and it drove a tank through the President’s various promises and assertions.

The AP reporters weren’t the only people who had some doubts. A Reuters news story confirmed my prediction, noting that “Stocks fell on Wednesday as investors found little new in a major speech by President Obama on how he planned to stabilize the economy, while gloomy home sales data weighed on the market.”

Facts are stubborn things. Eventually they cannot be ignored.

I have previously pointed out that this new President’s start in office has had what is surely the shortest “honeymoon” on record with both the public and the media. We’re not talking about FDR’s famous “first hundred days.” We are talking 56 days as this is being written.

There is, I suspect, a growing feeling among both the public and the media that this recession, if the White House and Congress had done NOTHING, would have run its course. All recessions do. But Obama came out almost immediately calling it a “catastrophe” in order to gin up support for a “stimulus” bill that surely had been in the works for the last two years that Democrats had control of Congress, but were unable to get passed because of a potential presidential veto by George W. Bush.

All that pent-up desire, for example, to reverse the welfare reform that occurred in 1996 after the GOP had gained control of Congress and for which then President Clinton took credit is now being undone. Never mind that it required people to find work in order to qualify for assistance. Never mind that it greatly reduced the cost of welfare to both the federal and state governments.

But I digress. While it is undeniably true that Obama knows how to deliver a speech, it is increasingly evident that he has great difficulty delivering the truth. Even his birth certificate is in doubt. The Hawaiian document put forth during the campaign has been declared a forgery by experts and a bad one at that.

There is no need for me to repeat what others have said about the contents of the State of the Union speech. It was a political statement, full of dubious promises and claims. I have this vision of a small group of historians some years far from now sitting around like a group of Talmudic scholars and laughing hysterically over what Obama said.

The problem for the rest of us, however, is that there is NOTHING to laugh at in his speech and the initial reaction of Wall Street had a lot of investors bailing out. The market will surely regain some, lose some, regain some, lose some. The operative word is “fluctuate.” Still, it is a window to how the speech was received by real people dealing in real money.

If the economy does improve, it will not be due to anything in the “stimulus” bill. It will be because a lot of people, small businesses and large, will make their own private bet that they must invest in their own future. Others will take advantage of the low housing prices and interest rates on mortgages. It’s called capitalism.

If public opinion about Obama is this tepid less than two months into his administration, I suspect the polls will report a continued dip in his numbers. This happened to the unlamented Jimmy Carter whose failure to deal with a recession and the taking of hostages by the Iranians gave him one term in office. I’m only surprised he has not moved to Iran and run for president there.

As to the Republicans, they are being handed the 2010 Congress on a platter. What they need is a real leader. Gov. Bobby Jindal is not that man. Louisiana, home of the populist Huey Long who gave FDR indigestion, is famed more for its history of corruption and general ineptitude than, say, Indiana, whose Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels was re-elected because of---not despite of---real fiscal prudence.

There are some potentially strong Republicans who could give Obama a real run in 2012. The party did the right thing in opposing the “stimulus” bill, but now it has to find some real courage and carry the fight to him every step of the way. It’s time to take the gloves off.

All this talk about being non-partisan makes me want to puke.

Early signs the media is already having second thoughts and buyer’s remorse must be acted upon before those sheep lead the other sheep over the cliff. Again.

Friday, February 20, 2009

A fun little tribute vid :D

Okay so I am a geek; I admit and I'm proud of who am. One of the things I do as a geek is make homages to awesomely epic movies that I love. Here is one that I made to my favorite fantasy movie of all time- Lord Of The Rings (I count all 3 as one movie).

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Super Useless

This is an awesome blog and pretty funny. Check it out!
Super Useless Super Powers

Monday, January 12, 2009

My issues with the movie 28 Weeks Later...





I just watched the movie 28 Weeks Later on Blue Ray tonight via Netflix. I have some issues with the movie, because feel the logic in a few parts really killed the suspension of disbelief for me.

The first, and probably biggest error in the logic of the story, was how the whole infection starts again. If you haven't seen this movie and don't want to know what happens, then stop reading, otherwise keep going... this one error with how the outbreak starts, for me, was pretty lame. Basically, it starts because the military brings back a female survivor who is appearantly immune to the Rage virus to a point where she doesn't go berzerk like the usual infected, but is instead a carrier. Medically, she's extremely important to finding a cure and possible immunity for everyone else. Now here's where all logic goes out the window, and I started having trouble from this point on believing in the movie- another character, who is this woman's husband goes into the isolation room where she's restrained on a table.

He goes in there because earlier in the movie, he abondons her for dead when a bunch of infected blitz their hideout. So, in his guilt he appearantly abandons all logic and enters the isolation room which isn't even being remotely monitored by CCTV, to be with her which results in his eventual infection and thus all hell breaks loose. The fact that he went into the chamber to be with her is not what I have a problem with; it was a traumatic moment when he had to ditch her earlier and probably his emotions overrode his logic. I could believe that.

What I don't believe, is that she was in a military held section of the Green Zone, which is the portion of London that's safe and protected for the Britons returning to England. This guy had a high clearance level and it was inferred earlier in the movie that he could basically get access anywhere in the green zone. Um, yeah, I call bullocks on this. The man is a civilian. There's no way in hell the military would give him access to the medical station of their installation, much less the ability to access the wife, who is basically the holy grail of beating this virus. It just wouldn't happen. No one in that whole place would have access to her except the installation commander and the doctors assigned to study the woman's immune system. This civilian guy would probably have limited access in the military installation pertaining to his civilian job of maintaining building the civilians lived inside, but there's just no way he'd get even in a hundred feet of his wife.

It totally killed the movie for me. After that it was just watching situations unfold that never even should have transpired in the first place because the writers had to have some conveniant McGuffin to further the plot. It just wasn't very creative to me in the manner the outbreak started.

Another thing that bugged me, but not as badly because this is used a lot in action movies, is the manner in which the Air Force blows the crap out of London. When the outbreak gets out of control the military's last ditch attept to stop everything is to napalm the streets. What I find bogus about all this is the way the napalm spreads through the streets- it just went everywhere, like it was following some invsible fuse, and wherever it went shit just spontaniously exploded. It just wasn't believable. I wish there would be an action movie where they represented explosions with real laws of physics...

There's also another part where the three remaining characters run into the underground (English for the subway) and there are corpses from the previous outbreak all over the place... the characters just run around in there like the whole place only smells like a casual fart. Umm no.

The underground needs ventilation to circulate the air and keep it cool. Since we can assume the power to the A/C units has been dead for weeks dead, the air down there is probably very stagnant. And with hundreds of decomposing corpses inside, the fumes would be so bad the characters wouldn't be able to walk, much less stay alive for very long. This is because the decomposing body emits ammonia and hydrogen sulfide- noxious in small doses and lethal in large. I think it's safe to say that in an atmosphere of stagnant air with hundreds of rotting corpses the air would be lethal. Even with the benefit of the doubt that it's not lethal, the smell from rotting flesh and roden exrement would be so bad that no one, not even these characters would have been able to stand the odor for long; hell they'd smell the rank stench long before they even got to the enterance of the underground.

Anyway if you can get past that stuff the movie is okay, I guess... It was entertaining, but I just feel that a little more effort into the research and writing could have been done.

Sometimes it sucks being so smart.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Wow... Subtle...

Just watch..


Hey! Stop thinking of it like that, perv!! hahahaha

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Grab your ankles

I just heard that next year the taxes in California are going to go up to 30%! What the fuck?!? That's like the taxes in Europe!!! So let me get this straight- people who DIDN'T DO ANYTHING to earn their money are now going to get a break?!? This is such bullshit. My standard of living is going to utterly change now thanks to Obama. Thanks a lot, prez.